1. Hadoop deployment on 64bit OS:
- 32bit OS have 3GB limit on Java Heap size so make sure that Hadoop Namenode/Datanode is running on 64bit OS.
2. Mapper and Reducer count setup:
This is cluster specific value and reflects total number of mapper and reducers per tasktracker.conf/mapred-site.xml | mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum | N | The maximum number of map task slots to run simultaneously |
conf/mapred-site.xml | mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum | N | The maximum number of reduce task slots to run simultaneously |
If no value is set the default is 2 and -1 specifies that the number of map/reduce task slots is based on the total amount of memory reserved for MapReduce by the sysadmin.
To set this value you would need to consider tasktracker CPU (+/- HT), DISK and Memory in account along with if your job is CPU intensive or not from a degree 1-10. For example if tasktracker is a quad core CPU with hyper-threading box, then there will be 4 physical and 4 virtual, total 8 CPU. For a high CPU intensive job we sure can assign 4 mappers and 4 reducer tasks however for a far less CPU intensive job, we can have up to 40 mappers & 40 reducers. You don’t need to have mapper or reducers count same as it is all depend on how the job are created. We can also have 6 Mappers and 2 Reducer also depend on how much work is done by each mapper and reduce and to get this info, we can look at job specific counters. The number of mappers and reducer per tasktracker is depend of CPU utilization per task. You can also look at each reduce task counter to see how long CPU was utilized for the total map/reduce task time. If there is long wait then you may need to reduce the count however if everything is done very fast, it gives you some idea on adding either mapper or reducer count per tasktracker.
Users must understand that having larger mapper count compare to physical CPU cores, will result in CPU context switching, which may result as an overall slow job completion. However a balanced per CPU job configuration may results faster job completion results.
3. Per Task JVM Memory Configuration:
This particular memory configuration is important to setup based on total RAM in each tasktracker.conf/mapred-site.xml | mapred.child.java.opts | -Xmx{YOUR_Value}M | Larger heap-size for child jvms of maps/reduces. |
The value for above parameter is depend on total mapper and reducer task per tasktracker so you must know these two parameters before setting. Here are few ways to calculate proper values for these parameters:
- Lets consider there are 4 mappers and 4 reducer per tasktracker with 32GB total RAM in each machine
- In this scenario there will be total 8 tasks running in any tasktracker
- Lets consider about 2-4 GB RAM is required for Tasktracker to perform other jobs so there is about ~28GB RAM available for Hadoop Tasks
- Now we can divide 28/8 and get 3.5GB per task RAM
- The value in this case will be -Xmx3500M
- Lets consider there are 8 mappers and 4 reducer per tasktracker with 32GB total RAM
- In this scenario there will be total 12 tasks running in any tasktracker
- Lets consider about 2-4 GB RAM is required for Tasktracker to perform other jobs so there is about ~28GB RAM available for Hadoop Tasks
- Now we can divide 28/12 and get 2.35GB per task RAM
- The value in this case will be -Xmx2300M
- Lets consider there are 12 mappers and 8 reducer per tasktracker
with 128GB total RAM, also one specific node is working as secondary
namenode
- It is not suggested to keep Secondary Namenode with Datanode/TaskTracker however in this example we will keep it here for the sake of calculation.
- In this scenario there will be total 20 tasks running in any tasktracker
- Lets consider about 8 GB RAM is required for Secondary namenode to perform its jobs and 4GB for other jobs so there is about ~100GB RAM available for Hadoop Tasks
- Now we can divide 100/20 and get 5GB per task RAM
- The value in this case will be around -Xmx5000M
- Note:
- HDP 1.2 have some new JVM specific configuration which can be used for much more granular memory setting.
- If Hadoop cluster does not have identical machines in memory (i.e. a collection of machines with 32GB & 64GB RAM) then user should use lower memory configuration as the base line.
- It is always best to have ~20% memory left for other processes.
- Do not overcommit the memory for total tasks, it sure will cause JVM OOM errors.
4. Setting mapper or reducer memory limit to unlimited:
Setting both mapred.job.{map|reduce}.memory.mb value to -1 or maximum helps mapreduce jobs use maximum amount memory available.
mapred.job.map.memory.mb
|
-1
|
This property’s value sets the virtual memory size of a single map task for the job.
|
---|---|---|
mapred.job.reduce.memory.mb | -1 | This property’s value sets the virtual memory size of a single reduce task for the job |
5. Setting No limit (or Maximum) for total number of tasks per job:
Setting this value to a certain limit put constraints on mapreduce job completion & performance. It is best to set it as -1 so it can use the maximum available.mapred.jobtracker.maxtasks.per.job | -1 | Set this property’s value to any positive integer to set the maximum number of tasks for a single job. The default value of -1 indicates that there is no maximum. |
6. Memory configuration for sorting data within processes:
There are two values io.sort.factor and io.sort.mb in this segment. Based on experience this value io.sort.mb should be 25-30% of mapred.child.java.opts value.conf/core-site.xml | io.sort.factor | 100 | More streams merged at once while sorting files. |
conf/core-site.xml | io.sort.mb | NNN | Higher memory-limit while sorting data. |
Also after running a few mapreduce jobs, analyzing log messages will help you to determine a better settings for io.sort.mb memory size. User must know that having a low io.sort.mb will cause lot more time in sort procedure, however a higher value may result job failure.
7. Reducer Parallel copies configuration:
A large number of parallel copies would cause high memory utilization and cause java heap error. However a small number would cause slow job completion. Keeping this valve to optimum helps mapreduce jobs complete faster.conf/mapred-site.xml | mapred.reduce.parallel.copies | 20 | The default number of parallel transfers run by reduce during the copy(shuffle) phase. Higher number of parallel copies run by reduces to fetch outputs from very large number of maps. |
8. Setting Reducer Input limit to maximum:
Sometimes setting a lower limit to reducer input size may cause job failures. It is best to set the reducer input limit to maximum.conf/mapred-site.xml | mapreduce.reduce.input.limit | -1 | The limit on the input size of the reduce. If the estimated input size of the reduce is greater than this value, job is failed. A value of -1 means that there is no limit set. |
9. Setting Map input split size:
During a mapreduce job execution, map jobs are created per split. Having split size set to 0 helps jobtracker to decide the split size based on data source.mapred.min.split.size | 0 | The minimum size chunk that map input should be split into. File formats with minimum split sizes take priority over this setting. |
10. Setting HDFS block size:
- Currently I have seen various Hadoop clusters running great with variety of HDFS block sizes.
- A user can set dfs.block.size in hdfs-site.xml between 64MB and 1GB or more.
11. Setting user priority, “High” in Hadoop Cluster:
- In Hadoop clusters jobs, are submitted based on users priority if certain type of job scheduler are configured
- If a hadoop user is lower in priority, the mappers and reducers task
will have to wait longer to get task slots in tasktracker. This could
ultimately cause longer mapreduce jobs.
- In some cases a time out could occur and the mapreduce job may fail
- If a job scheduler is configured, submitting job through high job scheduling priority user, will result faster job completion in a Hadoop cluster.
12. Secondary Namenode or Highly Available Namenode Configuration:
- Having secondary namenode or Highly Available namenode helps Hadoop cluster to be always/highly available.
- However I have seen some cases where secondary namenode or HA namenode is running on a datanode which could impact the cluster performance.
- Keeping Secondary Namenode or High Available Namenode separate from Datanode/JobTracker helps dedicated resources available for tasks assigned to the tasktracker
No comments:
Post a Comment